(NATIONAL) – U.S. Catholic bishops overwhelmingly approved the drafting of a “teaching document” that many of them hope will rebuke Catholic politicians, including President Joe Biden, for receiving Communion despite their support for abortion rights.
The decision, vehemently opposed by a minority of bishops, came despite appeals from the Vatican for a more cautious and collegial approach to the divisive issue. And it raises questions of how closely the bishops will be able to cooperate with the Biden administration on issues such as immigration and racial injustice.
The result of the vote — 168 in favor and 55 against — was announced Friday near the end of a three-day meeting of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops that was held virtually. The bishops had cast their votes privately on Thursday after several hours of impassioned debate.
Supporters of the measure said a strong rebuke of Biden is needed because of his recent actions protecting and expanding abortion access, while opponents warned that such action would portray the bishops as a partisan force during a time of bitter political divisions across the country.
As a result of the vote, the USCCB’s doctrine committee will draft a statement on the meaning of Communion in the life of the church that will be submitted for consideration at a future meeting, probably an in-person gathering in November. To be formally adopted, the document would need support of two-thirds of the bishops.
One section of the document is intended to include a specific admonition to Catholic politicians and other public figures who disobey church teaching on abortion and other core doctrinal issues.
Bishop Donald Hying of Madison, Wisconsin, said during Thursday’s debate that he speaks with many people who are confused by a Catholic president who advances “the most radical pro-abortion agenda in history,” and action from the bishops’ conference is needed.
“They’re looking for direction,” Hying said.
Bishop Robert McElroy of San Diego countered that the USCCB would suffer “destructive consequences” from a document targeting Catholic politicians.
“It would be impossible to prevent the weaponization of the Eucharist,” McElroy said. He warned that the initiative would weaken the bishops’ ability to speak on issues such as poverty, racism and the environment.
Biden, who attends Mass regularly, says he personally opposes abortion but doesn’t think he should impose that position on Americans who feel otherwise. He’s taken several executive actions during his presidency that were hailed by abortion-rights advocates.
During a White House event on the COVID-19 pandemic Friday, Biden was asked about the possibility that the bishops would approve a document suggesting that his abortion stance should disqualify him from receiving Communion.
“That’s a private matter, and I don’t think that’s going to happen,” the president said without elaborating.
The chairman of the USCCB doctrine committee, Bishop Kevin Rhoades of Fort Wayne-South Bend, Indiana, said no decisions have been made on the final contents of the proposed document. He said bishops who are not on the committee will have chances to offer input, and the final draft will be subject to amendments before it is put up to a vote.
Rhoades also said the document would not mention Biden or other individuals by name and would offer guidelines rather than imposing a mandatory national policy.
That would leave decisions about Communion for specific churchgoers up to individual bishops and archbishops. Cardinal Wilton Gregory, the archbishop of Washington, has made clear that Biden is welcome to receive Communion at churches in the archdiocese.
Gregory was one of nearly 70 bishops who signed a letter to USCCB president and Los Angeles Archbishop José Gomez urging him to delay the Communion discussion until the bishops convene in person, but that request was not granted.
“The choice before us at this moment,” Gregory said during Thursday’s debate, “is either we pursue a path of strengthening unity among ourselves or settle for creating a document that will not bring unity but may very well further damage it.”
The USCCB has identified the fight against abortion as its “preeminent” priority. But the bishops’ collective stance is at odds with the views of many Catholics in the U.S.
In recent polls by the Pew Research Center, about 56% of U.S. Catholics surveyed said abortion should be legal in most or all cases, and 67% said Biden should be allowed to receive Communion during Mass.
On the latter issue, Pew found a sharp partisan divide: 55% of Catholics who identify with the Republican Party said Biden’s abortion stance should disqualify him from Communion, compared with 11% of Catholics who lean Democratic.
Sixty Catholic Democratic members of the House of Representatives issued a statement Friday urging the USCCB to drop any effort to exclude politicians from Communion over the abortion issue, and calling it contradictory.
“No elected officials have been threatened with being denied the Eucharist as they support and have supported (other) policies contrary to the church teachings,” the statement said, “including supporting the death penalty, separating migrant children from their parents, denying asylum to those seeking safety in the United States.”
David Campbell, a political science professor at the University of Notre Dame, said the bishops’ vote “reflects the fact that the same fault lines dividing all American voters also divide American Catholics — and Catholic leaders.”
“The more attention the bishops focus on the Communion question, the more the church will be perceived as being in the political fray, which risks driving some Catholics away,” Campbell said via email.
Meanwhile, Santa Fe Archbishop John Wester does not support moving ahead with the new guidance at least not yet. Addressing the bishops’ conference, Wester said the question should be discussed when the bishops can meet in person. The following is the full statement:
There are two distinct and important issues at play in the current agenda item: the beauty/importance of the Eucharist and the question of who approaches this sacred Sacrament. I propose that we separate these issues, asking the Doctrine Committee to return to this body with a draft outline of a pastoral letter limited to the topic of the significance and beauty of the Eucharist and to do so only after consulting competent sacramental theologians and ecclesiologists The question of who should receive the Eucharist is a separate matter that has to be fully discussed and debated by the bishops when we can meet in person, following the wise advise of Cardinal Luis Ladaria, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Conflating these two issues will only lead to further discord and division among ourselves and our people. Separating these issues allows us bishops to find common ground by providing more time for in-depth discussion on a neuralgic and complicated question, while at the same time providing a venue conducive to attentive listening in a more serene and thorough manner. Therefore, I cannot support going ahead as proposed by the Doctrine Committee.Most Reverend John C. Wester, Archbishop of Santa Fe at the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops’ plenary meeting
Meanwhile, Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham’s Office sent a statement saying the governor’s support of access to reproductive health is clear. It went on to say the governor has no comment on the pollicization of the sacrament.
The following is the full statement from the governor’s office:
The governor’s record on access to reproductive health care is very clear. We have no comment on the politicization of a sacrament, which plays no role in official state government business.Nora Meyers Sackett, Press Secretary for the Office of the Governor
Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham
Associated Press religion coverage receives support from the Lilly Endowment through The Conversation U.S. The AP is solely responsible for this content.