NEW MEXICO (KRQE) – It’s like a tale from the Old West. Two New Mexico brothers believe their local government is scheming with another rancher to run them off their property. How? By tripling the number of cattle guards surrounding their Quay County land, making it impossible to move around. After the last two went in, Bucky and Dusty Stone took the long-standing feud to court.
“They’re putting them in every half a mile and the two over there are less than a quarter mile apart,” Dusty Stone said. Driving around the family’s property, you hit cattle guard, after cattle guard, after cattle guard. There are nine total on Quay County Roads 70, U, 69, and T, which divide their ranch.
“They’re willing to, to spend whatever it takes to run me off of the real estate. And I think it’s wrong, and I just don’t give up that easy,” Dusty added.
The property has been in his family since the 60s. Dusty and Bucky are the third generation to ranch and farm it… or try to. The brothers claimed the conspiracy started in 2007.
“I intended to use it as an investment and to retire there someday,” Bucky said. “And that’s what I can’t do anymore.” He claimed he has not been able to use his property how he wants to for more than a decade.
Bucky explained the cattle guard near the intersection of Quay Roads T and 70, cut off the only road he could use to access his farmland. “I have 16-foot farm equipment. So, the County come in and put in an 11-foot cattle guard and an 11-foot gate,” he said. “I cannot get farm equipment from one field to the other.” Bucky explained the cattle guard shut down his farming operation indefinitely.
That cattle guard is one of three the brothers said they asked the Quay County Commission to remove more than a decade ago. Their family put them in years prior, but the brothers explained they now had a fence, so the cattle guards weren’t necessary. Instead of removing them, they said their County replaced the three and then added four more.
Latest KRQE Investigates:
- ‘We failed him’: Adoptive parents avoid prison in child abuse case
- Albuquerque police cite ‘wrongful use of public property’ to clean up bus stops
- Neighbors, City clash over reach of encampment patrols near Gateway Center
- ATF: New Mexico man bought guns found at crime scenes in Mexico, Albuquerque
- Albuquerque sergeant retires as misconduct investigations pile up
Dusty said how those cattle guards went in created an issue. He claimed during installation the County took out part of his fence, forcing the use of the cattle guards. But he said the cattle guards did not work because the County has never kept them clear. Dusty shared photos dating back to 2007 that show the area underneath the cattle guards filled with dirt and overgrown weeds. He said the size of the cattle guards also made them ineffective. He accused the County of building them too narrow. “It’s ridiculously aggravating to see how they’re using public funds to harass somebody that’s out here doing their own thing,” Dusty said.
To keep his livestock on his property, Dusty closed his fence by moving the green gate attached to the cattle guards. The County then sued for conversion and a judge ruled Dusty had to put the gates back in their original positions. As a result, Dusty claimed, his livestock ended up getting out leading to two crashes – one deadly.
He reached out to the New Mexico Livestock Board for help. In a 2015 incident report, an investigator noted, the County should widen the cattle guards and post open-range signs to warn drivers. Dusty said that never happened. So, he has since illegally closed the fence. “And since then, I know of no complaints with my livestock,” Dusty said. “But up until then, there was complaints of the livestock running loose all the time.”
The whole mess, Dusty said, caused him to lose a business partner. The two had plans for Dusty to train his horses for rodeos and shows. “Decided he couldn’t afford the liability,” Dusty said of his business partner’s decision to back out.
To make up for the income loss, Dusty tried to continue training horses. He used them for chores across the property. Seven cattle guards blocked all but two remaining access points for him.
And then in 2019, the eighth cattle guard arrived making the problem worse. “The way they built it up, you can’t get equipment in and out with my horses and mules,” Dusty explained. “And they don’t maintain the gates that anybody can use.”
The ninth showed up in 2021, prompting Dusty and Bucky to take Quay County’s Road Superintendent and Commissioners to federal court. “They claim to be the law in this county, can do what they want and we’re going to find out, I guess,” Dusty said.
The Stone Family and Quay County are used to communicating about the cattle guards through lawsuits. Court records show both parties have filed against each other for more than a decade. The Stones have never won. In 2018, a judge sent the Stones a ‘Decision Letter,’ telling the family they could not make another pro se filing. They needed a lawyer to approve all future filings.
Now with representation, their attorney, Christina West, said this time will be different. “So, I would say many of those, you know, are — just have not been successful because Dusty just doesn’t have the background to bring them,” she explained. “But secondly, I would say what is different about these other actions is the sort of accumulation over time of all these cattle guards building up a stronger case, right?”
West claimed the installation of the last two cattle guards makes their case that the County is targeting the Stones. “We’re not aware of any other property in the vicinity or in Quay County that has nine cattle guards,” she said.
An invoice for the ninth cattle guard revealed the Stone’s neighbors purchased it. So, the brothers also named the Wallins in the suit. The invoice was created just 18 days after their second failed attempt to foreclose on the Stone’s property, court records show.
“The timing of it and both the legal grounds for it are very suspect,” West said. “It appears to just, you know, be an attempt of a conspiracy somehow between the County and these neighbors to try to get ownership of this property.”
The lawsuit demands the County remove all nine cattle guards. ”Because there is no reason for them and the property is fenced and so there’s no harm to the public,” West explained.
KRQE reached out to attorneys for the Quay County Road Superintendent, Commissioners, and the Wallins. None of them would comment because the lawsuit is still pending. But court filings revealed their attempts to dismiss the lawsuit. The County’s response also appeared to try to discredit the Stones — citing their history of filing lawsuits.
Waiting for a resolution, Bucky is developing a hunting business hoping to attract game to the property he can no longer farm. “I’ve had to divert resources to get this squared away,” he said. And Dusty explained he is running a tenth of the livestock he would like to be. “I’ve had to take outside jobs to earn money as far as like truck driving, these things, and construction work,” he said. “Lots of changes have had to come about to survive.”
A public records request showed the New Mexico Livestock Board’s involvement ended in 2019. A report written by NMLB’s Deputy Director, at the time, stated a meeting was scheduled with the Quay County Manager. But it was canceled the day before because the Quay County Manager told the NMLB “The attorney representing Quay County told him that the only involvement that the New Mexico Livestock Board should have in this matter would be the impounding and identification of any livestock found on the highway…. any discussion of cattle guards, gates, easements, or county roads was not the business of the Livestock Board.”
The NMLB declined an interview with KRQE.