Bill heightens penalties for rioting against oil pipeline

News
Oil Pipeline Protest Federal Land_448878

FILE – In this Sept. 9, 2016 file photo, More than a thousand people gather at an encampment near North Dakota’s Standing Rock Sioux reservation. The sprawling encampment that’s a protest against the four-state Dakota Access oil pipeline has most everything it needs to be self-sustaining _ except a federal permit to be there. The […]

BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — A North Dakota lawmaker urged colleagues on Monday to slap tighter penalties on people involved in riots, the latest measure the Republican-controlled Legislature is considering that was spawned by ongoing protests against the Dakota Access oil pipeline.

Under the proposal, those convicted of participating in a riot involving more than 100 people could be sentenced to up to 10 years in prison and a $20,000 fine — double the current penalties for a lower-end felony. Participation in smaller-sized riots, currently a misdemeanor, would be upgraded to a felony carrying up to five years in prison and a $10,000 fine.

State Rep. Todd Porter, a Mandan Republican who is the measure’s sponsor, told the House Judiciary Committee on Monday that the proposal “makes sure perpetrators and instigators of this type of activity are charged accordingly.”

He said his proposal comes in direct response to the four-state, $3.8 billion pipeline that drew thousands of protesters this summer to an encampment near the Standing Rock Sioux reservation. Porter said some of those involved in the pipeline protests who are charged only with misdemeanor penalties immediately have “bonded out” and have returned to engage in more clashes with law enforcement. Elevating the charges to felonies would likely stop that, he said.

There have been more than 625 arrests in North Dakota since mid-August.

“At some point they have to be taken out of the game, and this bill does that,” Porter said.

Another of the proposals being considered in response to the pipeline protests would exempt drivers from liability if they unintentionally injure or kill a pedestrian obstructing traffic on a public road.

Dallas Goldtooth, a protest organizer and member of the Indigenous Environmental Network, called the legislation “very reactionary and knee-jerk.”

“It could impact all forms of public speech and First Amendment rights and I encourage the citizens of North Dakota to speak out against these proposals,” said Goldtooth, whose group had been one of the main camp organizers before heeding the tribe’s call to leave last month. That group and other organizers have since called on Dakota Access opponents to spread out around the country rather than concentrate in southern North Dakota.

Assistant Attorney General Jon Byers spoke in support of the legislation, as did an official with the group representing the North Dakota Peace Officers Association. Byers said state law already differentiates between a lawful protest and a riot, which is defined as having “tumultuous and violent conduct.”

No one spoke in opposition to riot-related bill on Monday and the committee took no action.

Copyright 2020 Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Latest Video

Now Trending on KRQE.com

Video Forecast

Grant's Friday Night Forecast

More Weather Video Forecast
Albuquerque Hourly Forecast

Don't Miss

More Don't Miss