DHAKA, Bangladesh (AP) — A special tribunal dealing with war crimes involving Bangladesh's 1971 independence war against Pakistan has asked an international rights group to explain why it shouldn't be charged with contempt of court for comments the group made about a recent ruling.
Last month, New York-based Human Rights Watch issued a statement saying the trial of former Islamic party leader Ghulam Azam was "deeply flawed" and did not meet international standards. Azam was sentenced to 90 years in jail for war crimes.
The statement prompted prosecutors to file a contempt petition against the group.
The tribunal ruled Monday that Human Rights Watch must reply within three weeks or it could be charged.
The U.S. ambassador in Bangladesh expressed his concern last month over the prosecutors' move.
Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Meet Meggie, this week's Pet of the Week. If you're interested in Meggie or any other furry four-legged friend, call the Animal Humane Association of New Mexico at visit the Animal Humane website.
It's an industry growing exponentially, but training for it is not.
A Colorado company is recalling 45 tons of meat and poultry products a federal agency says were produced under unsanitary conditions.
New Mexico could become the third state in the nation to let doctors help their terminally-ill patients end their lives by prescribing medication to end their suffering.
APD is budgeted for 1,100 officers. Right now, the number of sworn officers is closer to 900.
The attorney for a state cop fired last week for shooting at a minivan full of kids tells News 13 her client deserves his job back.